Defense of Realism

Realism is the most prevalent theory considered in international theory. Until recently it has faced little confrontation from rival theories. Liberal Institutionalism has gained support in recent years, threatening realism's credibility. I felt that Grieco did an exceptional job distinguishing the differences between realism and liberal institutionalism, as well as give specific supporting arguments to nullify the rival's position. Grieco points out the difference in characterization of principle actors, neoliberals concern with cheating but neglect of relative achievement of gains, neoliberals belief that power and security are less important issues due to increased globalization, and the support given by neoliberals to international institutions. Although I believe there are several intriguing points made by the neoliberals, realism clearly has a much more formidable position. The most convincing point for me was the hypocrisy demonstrated by the liberal stance. Their belief in core realist principles but persistence for international institutions gives the impression that liberals would like to change the nature of the world but do not have an understanding as to the best way to approach it.